Revenant – Movie Review:
Extreme cold; horrific bear
attacks; eating raw liver. If this raw revenge western doesn't win Leonardo
DiCaprio an Oscar, nothing will.
Just over a month ago, I wrote that The Revenant gave Leonardo DiCaprio his
best chance at winning an Oscar to date. Now the only conceivable way that
might not happen is if the actor is mauled by a bear on his way to the podium.
What a preposterously enjoyable film DiCaprio and his director, Alejandro
González Iñárritu, have cooked up – a glistening, gut-wrenching wildernessconcerto
grosso, drunk on blockbuster quantities of self-importance and with the
coppery tang of machismo pricking on its palate. The Revenant is the embellished true
story of a 19th-century fur trapper, Hugh Glass, who
endures a savage bear attack and the death of his son at the hands of a fellow
frontiersman – then claws his way across thousands of miles of frozen rock in
order to settle the score.
We watch him swirl down icy river rapids, scratch his way up cliff-faces,
and shiver in the starlight while his beard grows stiff with frost. In one
scene, he devours the
still-throbbing liver of a freshly slaughtered bison, the organ
hot and slippery in his trembling hands.
By “he”, “him” and “his”, I mean DiCaprio’s character – but to an extent I
also mean DiCaprio, because part of the fun of watching The Revenant is knowing
its cast and crew went through
hell to make it. If you’ve read any coverage of the film, you’ll
be familiar with the on-set horror stories: the perishing cold, the miserable
cross-country tramps to remote locations, Iñárritu’s temper-fraying,
schedule-destroying insistence on shooting only with the available natural
light.
Every last grunt and stomp of effort is there to be felt in the finished
film, and you sense DiCaprio and Iñárritu wouldn’t have it any other way. The
film ends with Glass staring directly into the camera: in that moment, its
leading man might as well be confidently ushering you into the bathroom with a
ruler.
Separating what The Revenant is from what it means is
tricky, because the two are more or less the same thing. The film stretches for
sublimity, addressing grand, spiritual issues like revenge and rebirth. But its
moral turns out to be no more complicated than "don’t give up" – and
what really keeps you watching is the dumb thrill of finding out what
horrendous thing will happen next. The whole project is a bizarre blend of
arthouse and frat-house: an episode of Jackass as envisioned by Terrence
Malick.
What psychological gristle there is doesn’t come in Glass’s portion of the
film because, gripping as his story may be, there isn’t much more to the
character than suffering and stoicism. (Glass’s status as a father, which
should have complicated things, never quite connects in the way you’d hope.)
Instead, the intrigue comes in the side-story about the companions who abandon
him: Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy), a hard-bitten mercenary with a pancake-like
tomahawk scar across his scalp, and Bridger (Will Poulter, tremendous), a
callow young trapper who becomes the older man’s reluctant accomplice.
Every step of their respective journeys feels treacherous, every frame
infused with the landscape’s diamond-tipped beauty and breezy disregard for
human life. Snow whirls and billows, twilight glowers on the horizon, embers
dance like fireflies in the night. The hallucinatory texture of the film’s
world rhymes perfectly with Ryuichi Sakamoto and Alva Noto’s ambient score,
which sounds less composed than beamed down from the cosmos.
These visuals come courtesy of the brilliant cinematographer Emmanuel
Lubezki, who also racks up some show-stopping tracking shots here that match
the "single-take" stunt in his and Iñárritu’s previous collaboration, Birdman –
if not for length, then for nerveless swagger.
Foremost among them is the bear attack itself, which passes in three long
takes so raw and real, they move Glass’s suffering beyond immersive into the
realms of the participatory. At points, the creature (which is
computer-generated, though you wouldn’t know it) comes so close to the camera
that her breath actually fogs the lens – and later on, the breath and blood of
human characters will do the same.
Ordinarily, that would count as a basic error, and take you out of the film
in a heartbeat. But in The Revenant, it draws you further in, lending a hot
immediacy to its characters’ fight for life.
THE REVENANT: WATCH THE
TRAILERPlay!02:47
“Pain is temporary, but a film is forever,” Iñárritu said when collecting a Golden Globe for
Best Director last week. He’s absolutely right, but forever
isn’t a concept The Revenant has any time for. It’s two and a half hours of
beautiful, visceral present – a film that’s chasing transcendence and wants it
now, now, now.
Courtesy:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
No comments:
Post a Comment